One of the most pressing questions that I heard in the short
Connect-Exchange video was “how is home connected with identity?” For me the place I call home is my
identity. In that place I don’t have to
worry about assignment due dates, org meetings, grading, or anything like
that. In that place I can just worry
about enjoying life, being me. Home is
somewhere where I can truly relax and be my carefree self without a nagging
sense of, “you could be working.” Home
is somewhere I need to be from time to time to recharge. Up until now I’ve been referring to home as a
physical space in the Ozarks, but I don’t mean to imply that home is solely
tied to a physical space. In reality, I
guess it ties back to an emotional state where you feel comfortable being you in all meanings of the word.
Another question interested me was “what does it mean to be
an American?” This seems like such a
simple question, but I’m not even sure how I’d begin answering it. Is there such a thing as being an American? I wonder if I find this task difficult
because I myself am an American. Maybe
this fact blinds me from taking defining what it means to be American. I could tell someone what it means to be
Texan, but that is only because I have spent time as an outsider looking
in. What seems normal to a Texan becomes
abnormal to me, so I pay attention to it.
I may even internalize it as part of my own identity. In that same vein I don’t think I could
define what it means to be a Missourian.
I’ve lived there for most of my life and the norms and I’ve, therefore,
internalized the norms and activities of Missouri culture. This internalization is what complicates my
ability to critically define what it means to be American.
My difficulty defining what it means to be American brings
me to another question tied to the study of cultural rhetoric. Can one study one’s own culture with a
critical eye? Cultural insiders have embodied
many of the values and practices of their cultures, but seek to isolate many of
these values when studying them. Is that
possible given that the culture given the degree to which culture affects thought
patterns and epistemologies? This
observation makes me think that critical study of another culture requires an
outsider perspective. Then again, I might just be influenced by my own epistemological background where objectivity is essential. I don’t know, but it’s a thought that I had
as I began writing a response to this post.
David,
ReplyDeleteGreat thoughts on both of your points. I responded to your comment on my post with a similar thought on what it means to be an American. Are we too close to the topic to study it objectively? Will we only relate the positive things we see about being an American? Along the same lines I think nearly all of us only relate the positive things about what Home is. I am sure most of us have had something bad happen at home. I have been thinking about this a lot since we first made these posts. For me home may also be where my brother died when I was 17. While that was (still is) a terrible thing, I also take some comfort in the fact that he died at home. His dying at home hasn't really added a negative aspect to my thoughts of home. If anything, it reinforced some of the the positive aspects. Home is a strange concept.
Absolutely; what being American is can be very difficult to deduce. Nice thinking about multiple perspective, too. Very helpful, David, thanks!
ReplyDeleteI think you hit the nail on the head with whether or not you can view your own culture with a critical eye. Lately, the pendulum is swinging wildly both ways: "love it or leave it" opposes "Europe is so much better in (put social topic here)."
ReplyDelete